Loading...
ApplicationSite Plan Review Applicatio The Site Plan Review process involves presenting a proposal to the Planning Board and answering any questions that may arise regarding your project. As part of its review process, the Town of Queensbury Planning Board notifies the general public and property owners within 500 feet of the proposed project, conducts a public hearing and performs an environmental assessment of the proposal in accordance with the N.Y.S. Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) requirements. This application was designed to solicit the information necessary for applicant to comply with the Town of Queensbury Site Plan Review requirements. A Pre - Application meeting with the Planning Staff is required. Staff members are available by scheduling an appointment, our office is open weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Town of Oueensbga Planning Staff Chris Round, Director / Zoning Administrator Marilyn Ryba, Senior Planner Craig Brown, Zoning / Code Compliance Officer Laura Moore, Planner Submission Requirements: Please submit 1 original and 14 copies of the completed application package, plot plan and copy of deed (1) with a $25 application fee to the Planning Office by the last Wednesday of the month for consideration during the following month. Call or visit our office with any questions. All pages must be completed prior to review by Staff and the Planning Board. Town of Queensbury Planning Office 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804 Phone: (518) 761-8220 Fax: (518) 7454437 E-mail: planning tgueensburv_.net www.queensbury.net 1] • Application No. (Office Use Only) Project Location: Tax Map ID: Zone Classification: Detailed Description of Project: (include current & proposed use): Applicant: Address: Home Phone: Work Phone / Fax: Applicant's Agent: Address: Home Phone: Work Phone / Fax: Property Owner: Address: Home Phone: Work Phone / Fax: General Information Hof s - s ubd,v s , or, ce,D - 2 My!- s M St J V-v nev�evv� �tn(acv��,+�5� Zyic. - 7 �% %7a [ i t Cow, va n n Imo. Q41, Queensyu.. ►YY 12�04 -7cfB- 0G74- o K6c#,,- laq- c. c� i v� stn,v��oh S4. 43kwee"slovv%,,Y G -745-4406 -Iqz- -7a z- 951% t� Saone j�s 1t�pi�Gu�� Directions to Site: _ I-uS� S•dc of J aOA �u.1 E Site Development Data Area / Type Existing sq. ft. Proposed Addition Total sq. ft. sq. ft. i A. Building Footprint B. Detached Garage I O v o C. Accessory Structure(s) O O p D. Paved, gravel or other hard surfaced areas O 1 S S3Co IS 5 E. Porches/Decks me \sided t% %V%rtvd0d I- � F. Other O o C) Total Non -Permeable Sum A throu h F _ L� 2- 14 CoZ.S o Parcel Area 1710ig40 110a O Percent Non -Permeable (total Non-Penneablo'Parmi Area) D 4• l 7e 140 9. Setback Requirements Required Existing Proposed Front 1 - 7 Co 81T Front 2 - New '4oa6 O >L Shoreline _ Side Yard I — _ Side Yazd 2 Rear Yard t eos 1 .1 Rear O - 7-b. 3 Buffer / Travel Corridor o — q Height 14D p 3 0 1 1] CheCklht - Please prepare a map depicting existing and proposed conditions. Failure to complete the following checklist or include all the required information on your plot plan will result in a determination of incompleteness and a delay in the processing of your application. *Check/Initial Each Bax I P— Provided NA —Not Applicable I ADDRESS EACH ITEM WR — Waiver Re uested P NA WR ! GENERAL A Title, name. address of applicant & person responsible for preparation of drawing B. North arrow. Tay Map ID. date prepared and scale (minimum I in. = .W ft), ✓ C. Boundaries of the property plotted to scale, zoning boundary D. Location of principal structure. accessory structures with exterior dimensions E. Location of site improvements including outdoor storage areas_ driveways (existing andproposed). parking areas. etc. F. Setbacks for all structures and improvements WATER & SEWER A. Location of on -site sewage disposal facilities. design details. construction details. flow rates. and number of bedrooms served ✓ B. Location of water supply (i.e. well) and septic on adjoining lots with separation ____ _ distances to existing or proposed on -site water supply and sc 'c. C. Separation distances for proposed sewage disposal system to well and waterbodies. D. Location and description of existing public or private water supply (well lake, etc.). Method of securing public or private water. location, design and construction of water suppiv includin Iv'water usa e. E. Percolation test location PARKING/PERMEABLE AREAS ✓ A No. of spaces required for project including calculations and justification. ✓ B. No. of existing parking spaces. no. to be removed. no. to maintain and type of surfacing material (e.., gravel.paced). ✓ C. Provision for pedestrian and handicap access and parking. ✓ D. Location ad design details of ingress, egress, loading areas and cutting. ✓ E. Location and character of green areas (existing and proposed). modification to green area buffer zone to remain undisturbed. ✓ F. Lighting, location and deign of all existing or proposed outdoor lighting. ADDITIONAL SITE DEVELOPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS ✓ A Location of on -site & adjacent watercourses: streams. rivers, lake and wetlands. B. Location of proposed & existing: utility/energy distribution systems (gas, electric. solar. telephone. C. Location. design. and construction of all existing and proposed site improvements including: drains, culverts. retaining walls, fences, fire & emergency zones and hydrants. ✓ D. Location and amount / portion of building area proposed for office, mamdacturing, retail sales. or other commercial activities. E. Signage: Location. size, type, design and setback Additional Requirements 1. Waiver Request - Provide a letter to the Zoning Board and/or Planning Board requesting the waivers indicated on the checklist. 2. Commercial and Industrial Development requires submission of a Landscaping Plan, a Stormwater>fanagement Plan, a Grading Plan, and a Lighhting Plan. 3. Other elements integral to the proposed development as considered necessary by the reviewing board. 4. Identify any Federal, State or County permits required for the project's schedule. 5. Please submit record of application for approval status of all necessary permits required from Federal, State and County officials. 6. Other Fees may apply — Engineering Fees, Recreation Fees i l.161 (11/95)—Text 12Ah • PROJECT I.D. NUMBER 617.20 SEQR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I —PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project soonsorj 1. APPLICANT (SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME Chty .y, r -=yt g. I Noe k1i,tL A cc . Cave ... PROJECT LOCATION Municioalily 1 COI n 1� Countv \Ajck �h A PRECISE LOCATION ISttee! address and road intersections. prominent Ianomark5, etc., or provide mapl (^ys� *'CAe _C"j _;Xoob Savi� p �a�loe�✓� A�✓i�a 5 IS PROPOSED ACTION: ew ❑ Expansion ❑ Modification/allerat ion 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: u�r 7. AMOUNT OF LA AFFECTED Z Initially r acres Ultimately t. acres B. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS7 ,MYes ❑ No If No. describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? ppIt AResidential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial El Agriculture ❑ PaWFoest)Open space Other Describe: „OL jar u�S r UN 10 DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? i9Yes ❑ No If yes, list agency(s) and permlUapprovals Sewer d11rAif-ick -,;D- 1w01*-'a. 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑ Yes J91,No If yes, list agency name and permlUapproval 12, AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMR/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑ Yes r60. 1 CERTIFYTHATTHE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AOplicanUsponsor name: j t Date: Signature: If the action is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 PART II —ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMM (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EACEED ANY TYPE I THRESHM IN 6 NYCRR PART 617.4? If yes. coordinate th iew Process and use the FULL EAF. ❑ Yes No E. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR. PART 617.61 It No, a negative declara:'on ^tay be supers by another involved agency. ❑Yes f No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING: (Answers may De handwritten, if IeglDle) C1. Existing air cual(ty, surface 01 groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns. solid waste production or disposal, potential for eg_rooss, fl. drainage or flooding problems? Expiain briefly: V C2. Aesthetic agricultu /Ire. aronaeooglcal, historic. or other natural or cultural resources: or community or neignoornaod character Explain briefly cu: Iv O C3. Vegetation or fauna. fish, shellfish or wildlife species, significant habitats, or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: No C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted, or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly N� C5. Growth, subsequent development, or related activities likely to be Induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. Oro C6. Long term, shop term, cumulative, or other effects not identified in Cl-05? Explain briefly. - C7. Other impacts (in lug changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly. D. WILL THE PR0.1E T HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CFA? ❑ Yes o E. IS THERE, OR IS j1ERE LIKELY TO BE. CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑ Yes _tr-lfpgNo If Yes, explain briefly PART III —DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether It Is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with Its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) irreversibility, (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part 11 was checked yes, the determination and significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY ,,occur, Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting this determination: Print or Tytx Name of Responsmie Officer in Lead Agency S grin or Respor e Officer in Lead Agency Date 2 Signature Page This Page includes the Authorization to Act as Agent Form, Engineering Fee Disclosure, Other Permit Responsibilities and Agreement to provide documentation required. Complete the following if the OWNER of the property is not the same as the applicant Owner's Agent Form Owner: Designates: As agent regarding For Tax Map No.: Deed Reference: SIGNATURE: _ Variance _ Site Plan _ Subdivision _ Section Block Lot _ Book _ Page Date (Owner) (Date) Complete the following if the APPLICANT is unable to attend the meeting or wishes to be represented by another party: Appliggant's Agent Form 6W /Owner rT Designates: As agent regarding: For Tax Map No.: SIGNATURE: �L-liey,Me��t.a���JJ�P_✓C��O ,��� Variance .XSite Plan _ Subdivision 0 S ion 7—Block t r Lot — 4Lc f� n (Owner) 3-2 FJ (Date) :5OL l ,v.,g, o-�) Engineering Fee Disclosure: Applications may be referred to the Town consulting engineer for review of septic design, storm drainage, etc. as determined by the Zoning or Planning Department. Fees for engineering review services will be charged directly to the applicant. Fees for engineering review will not exceed $1,000 without notification to the applicant. Please Note: Other permits may be required for construction or alteration activity subsequent to approval by the Zoning Board or Planning Board. It is the applicant's responsibility to obtaigany additional permits. Official Meeting Minutes Disclosure: It is the practice of the Community Development Dept. to have a designated stenographer tape record the proceedings of meetings resulting from application, and that minutes transcribed from those tapes constitute the official record of all proceedings. If there is a discrepancy between such record and the handwritten minutes taken by the designated stenographer, the handwritten minutes shall be deemed the official record. I, the undersigned, have thoroughly read and understand the instructions for submission, agree to the submission requirements and completed the \che klist SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT: / ,_ �` Date 3 2 F " SIGNATURE OF AGENT: E Date 3 ZE)i p 0 TOWN OF QUEENSBURY 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-5902 518-761-8201 March 14, 2002 William Johnson North Country Academy 6 Willowbrook Drive Queensbury, NY 12804 RE: North Country Academy Dear Mr. Johnson: '::�p13-�:?Cv) In response to your March 13, 2002 inquiry regarding the above -referenced project and the applicability of the Town of Queensbury Code, I would offer the following information. The property in question lies within a Multi -Family Residential, MR-5 zoning district within the Town of Queensbury. A daycare center is an allowable use, with site plan review, within the MR-5 zone. Your project has completed the necessary site plan review process and as such, the project is an allowable, approved use and may proceed with development and operation. As discussed with the project developer, there are a few outstanding site development items that must be addressed this spring. Mainly, these items are landscaping and site grading and, if completed on schedule, will not adversely affect your operation. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CB/sh L:\Craig\20021etters\JohnsonNCtyAcad31402.doc "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY ... A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 A u-� lukIdin5 IS 2Oned prcpee �, ILA 0.66us hc•s t4,E4 CtIt sew. ,,dz 4. 6e e ch,td cclre cen-ler , fo YY1 r (xi.c�t� d_ilti Gi/il ;"i8 �'lil Ujk,tA P, Town of Queensbury Planning Board Community Development Department Staff Notes FILE Project Applicant: SCHERMERHORN PROPERTIES - DAY CARE Application No.: Site Plan 13-2001 Project Location: Bay Road, Baybrook Professional Office Park, Lot #5 Zone: Multifamily Residential 5,000 square feet SEQR Status: Unlisted Meeting Date: May 15, 2001 Project Description The applicant proposes a 9,600 square foot Day Care center on lot 5 of the Baybrook Professional Park. Project Analysis (Section 179-38) Site Overview The building is located on lot 5 of Baybrook Professional Park. The entrance to the building is oriented towards the new proposed road. The one-story building is proposed to have siding and brick architecture. There will be four walk lights (height not noted) and three 20 foot cutoff light fixtures. The project proposes one wall sign and a freestanding sign at the entrance to the Day Care center. There is also a sign to be located at the entrance of the park with each of the new tenants names. ffic Circulation, Parking The plans indicate there will be a one-way traffic movement from west to east. The site provides 32 spaces with two handicap spaces at the entrance of the building. The Ordinance does not have a parking requirement for a Day Care Center, whereas the Draft Ordinance requires 1 per 2 employees. The applicant has not indicated the number of employees or the number of children. Staff would suggest crosswalks be added to the plans where the parking spaces are not adjacent to the building. The plans should indicate where the company vehicle(s) will be parked and the loading area for the vehicle. Utility. Stormwater, Landscaping Emergency Services The application has been forwarded to the Water and Wastewater departments and C.T. Male, engineer for review and comment. The Beautification Committee has indicated that the size on the planting list should be consistent and should be at least 3 inch caliper. Areas of Concern or Importance The Baybrook Professional Park subdivision has not been filed with our office for signatures due to pending confirmation from DEC as to receipt of their stream crossing permit. If the Board should consider approval of this application two conditions should be considered: 1. The approval is conditioned upon the connection to the proposed municipal wastewater system, and 2. The approval is conditioned upon additional landscaping and a pedestrian connection to other developments in the park. E The Draft Zoning ordinance contains design guidelines for the Bay Road Corridor. One of the objectives of the design guidelines is to preserve the visual character and residential flavor of the architecture of the corridor. We suggest the Board pay particular attention to the architectural of the facility. The Planning Board is currently empowered to examine the building design, appearance, and general site compatibility. The Board may utilize the Bay Road Design Guidelines as a basis for enhancing or modifying the building appearance. Sug esp tions Staff would recommend the application be tabled until the filing of the subdivision map and review of the revised plans for an on -site septic system. In addition, the following items should be addressed: • The height for the walk lights; • A lighting plan for the site showing illumination levels of the walk lights, pole lights and any building lights; • The number of employees and children; • The hours of operation; • Clarify that all trees are three-inch caliper • An inset map of the subdivision should be included on the site plan TOWN OF QUEENSBURY 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-5902 June 10,2002 Richard Schermerhorn 15F Birdie Drive Queensbury, NY 12804 RE: North Country Academy Day Care Site Plan Review File No. 13-2001 Subdivision No. 9-2000 Tax Map Parcel No. 60.-2-4 (Lot 5) Dear Mr. Schermerhom: 0 1 , . Sfi'l2 / 2 518-761 -8201 This letter will serve as a reminder that the site conditions for the above -referenced site are still not in compliance with the approved plan and subdivision. Specifically, the large trees that you removed along Bay Road (that were to remain as per SB 9-2000) have yet to be replaced as per the agreement you made with Craig Brown and acknowledged in your letter dated March 8, 2002. Also, none of the erosion and sediment control measures, adjacent to a DEC -flagged wetland, have yet to be constructed (the "check dam" and the "hay bale dams" with silt fencing). In your letter dated March 8, 2002, you agreed to complete all of this site work by May 1, 2002. During the last inspection of the site on June 4, 2002, another site condition was discovered that needs to be corrected. No erosion and sediment control measures were found at the end of the temporary tum-around to the north of the Day Care site. As a result, numerous gullies have formed and a considerable amount of sediment has eroded into the small pond adjacent to the DEC -flagged wetland. It is my expectation that you will contact this office by June 17, 2002 to address these matters. Should you have any other questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, DE\?PT. OFCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Bruce G. Frank Code Compliance Officer BGF/sh cc: Chris Round, Craig Brown, Planning Board LABmce Frank\2002 Letters and Appearance Tickets\Waming Letters\Schermerhom (North Country Academy Day Care) 10jun02.doc "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY ... A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 -0 TOWN OF QUEENSBURY 742 Bay Road, Queensbury, NY 12804-5902 518-761-8201 January 22, 2002 Richard Schermerhom 15F Birdie Drive Queensbury, NY 12804 RE: North Country Academy Day Care Site Plan Review File No. 13-2001 Tax Map Parcel No. 60: 2-4 (Lot 5) Dear Mr. Schermerhom: This letter will serve to document my findings as a result of a recent, January 17, 2002 site inspection of the above -referenced site. The current site conditions are not in compliance with the approved plan. Specifically, the existing row of trees (poplar species) west of the building along Bay Road, were found removed. The cut and piled trees were found on Lot #3. Sheet #5 of the Landscaping Plan for the Baybrook Professional Park specifically states, "existing trees to remain". Also, none of the erosion and sediment control measures were found to be in place on the east and south sides of the parcel. Specifically, the "check dam" and the "hay bale dams" with silt fencing were not found. You will need to install the "check dam" and the "hay bale dams" as per the plans before the start of the Spring thaw. You will also be required to revise the landscaping plan. The species type, size of, and number of trees will have to be addressed in the revision to the plan. Your proposed revision will have to be reviewed and approved. It is my expectation that you will submit to this office by February 11, 2002 a revised landscaping plan and a schedule of completion for the installation of the above -referenced erosion and sediment control measures. Finally, the cut and piled trees on Lot #3 will need to be removed as per § A183-25F. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, DEPT. OF CO EVELOPMENT Bruce G.Frank Code Compliance Officer BGF/sh L:\Bruce Frank\2002 Letters and Appearance Tickets\Warning Lettm\Schennerhom (North Country Academy Day Care) 22jan02.doc "HOME OF NATURAL BEAUTY ... A GOOD PLACE TO LIVE" SETTLED 1763 d2 FRI 11:52 AM SCHEHORN FAX N0. 5187IJ653 P. 2 SCHERMERHO PROPERTIES INCORPOR. IN nranlE DR1vE • QUEENSBURY, NEW YORK 12W4 (518) 708-0674 • FAX (518) 743.OM March 8, 20M Town of Queenslnuy 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 Attn: Craig Brown Dear Craig Brown, IN TED Per our conversation this morning regarding trees and the retention area at the Day Care Center on Bay Road, I will complete the retention area no later than May 1'I, 2002. Also I will replant 5-(3" to 4" in caliber) sugar maples along Bay Road per our conversation. Thank you. Sincerelly, n Richard P. Schemierhom SebermerhornProperties, Inc. Town of Queensbury • Department of Wastewater 823 CORINTH ROAD, QUEENSBURY, NEW YORK 12804 Phone: (518) 745-5589 • Fax: (518) 798-3320 TO: Laura Moore 2 FROM: Mike Shaw' DATE: May 7, 2001 RE: Site Plan Review 13-2001 & 19-2001 RECEIVED .i CL TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING OFFICE The two proposed site plans listed above for a professional office building and a daycare center indicate sewage being discharged to a municipal sewer system. These parcels are not within any Town sanitary sewer district. Although there has been some discussion of a possible sewer district extension, we do not have a proposal before us. Based on this fact, I feel that the review of these site plans at this time is premature. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at my office. MOS/sek cc: Ken Martin Tom Nace RECEIVED 6, ny it G 1.F a4p, TOWN OF QUEENSBURY PLANNING OFFICE May01-30 Project Name: Owner: ID Number: County Project#: Current Zoning: Community: Warren County Planning Board Project Review and Referral Form Reviewed by Board on May 9, 2001t- F-vd G ' Li Schermerhom Properties, Inc. Schermerhorn Properties, Inc. QBY-SPR-13-2001 May01-30 MR-5 Queensbury Project Description: Applicant proposes a 9,600 sq. ft. Day Care Facility with associated site work. Site Location: Bay Road, Lot 45, Baybrook Professional Park. Tax Map Number(s): 60-2-4 TGYI"" C — Y Staff Notes: The applicant has provided a stormwater management report (the substance of which is attached) and a number of large, detailed site plans including a utility plan, a lighting plan, and a landscaping plan. These plans are on file at the offices of the County Planning Department and will be available for review at the meeting. To give Board members an opportunity to review the plans thoroughly, Staff recommends discussion. Local actions to date (if any): A public hearing will be held May, 2001. County Planning Board Recommendation: Approve Local Action:/Final Dispensation (Provide reason if local action is contrary to Warren County Planning Board recommendation): Warren County Planning B d Date Igned Local Official "5l3!/U! Date Signed PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE WARREN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD WITHIN 30 DAYS OF FINAL ACTION. tl0; tldl Y7tl1 LZ: 9L Oltl /7tlk7tlyb DUSTBUSTERS • PAGE B1 Town of Aueeusbury Comex for Comteunity Beautltieation Meeting Date: May 7, 2001 Present: M. Gosline; J. Wetherbee; M. Reese; P. Lorenz; P. Carpenter Absent: K. Dougherty SITE #13-2001: Applicant: Scbermerhorn ProcerNa, Contract Veldec Type: Unlisted Property Owner: Guido Passarelli Agent: Nace Engineering Zone: MR-5 Location: Bay Rd., Lot #5, Saybrook Professional Park Applicant proposes a 94M sq. ft. Day Care Facility with associated siteworL Day Care Centers in MR-5 zones require Planning Board review and approval. Applicant did not appear. Committee recommends the following: 1 - All trees must meet Queensbury Standards. Trees must be 'large' trees, at least 3 '/a inches in caliber. Evergreens must be 4 feet to six feet in height. Shrubs must be 2 feet to 3 feet in height and spread. Smaller trees or flowering trees must be 2 '/a inches in caliber. We recommend a sprinkler system to maintain the shrubs and lawn. In the event that ANY of the landscaping should die, we would expect immediate replacement according to the same specs required above. Regular maintenance of lawns and shrubs is expected. SITE #19-2001 Applicant: Ric and Schermer orn, Cgntract Vendee Property Owner: Guido Passarelli Agent: Jarreet-Martin, PLLC Zone: MR-5 Location: Bay Road, Lot #4, Saybrook Professional Park Applicant proposes a 7^ sq. ft three unit professional office building. All was in MR zones require Planning Board review and approval. Applicant did not appear. Committee recommends the following: i - All trees must meet Queensbury Standards. Trees must be `large' trees, at least 3 '/a inches in caliber. Evergreens must be 4 feet to six fat in height Shrubs must be 2 fat to 3 feet in height and spread. Smaller trees or flowering trees must be 2 'h inches in caliber. We recommend a sprinkler system to maintain the shrubs and lawn. in the event that ANY of the landscaping should die, we would expect immediate replacement according to the same specs required above. Regular maintenance of lawns and shrubs is expected. We recommend a sidewalk or walkway of some type for the entire project, possibly connecting to Meadowbrook Road. RECE/ VED TOP gNNiNcEENSBU OFFICE RV RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED LOCAL LAW NO. _ OF 2001 TO AMEND QUEENSBURY TOWN CODE CHAPTER 179 "ZONING" TO ADD A PERMITTED USE TO MR-5 ZONE RESOLUTION NO. 141, 2001 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. James Martin WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. Daniel Stec WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board has received a request from Schermerhorn Properties, Inc., to consider amendment of Town Code Chapter 179 entitled "Zoning" to include day care centers as a permitted use in any Multifamily Residential Zone (MR-5), and WHEREAS, the Town Board is presently considering adoption of a new Zoning Ordinance and the draft Zoning Ordinance provides for this addition to the MR-5 zone, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to consider adoption of Local Law No.: _ of 2001 to amend Queensbury Town Code Chapter 179 entitled "Zoning," specifically Section 179-18 entitled "Multifamily Residential Zones, MR-5", to add day care centers as a permitted use in any MR-5 zone, and WHEREAS, this legislation is authorized in accordance with New York State Municipal Home Rule Law § 10 and Town Law Article 16, and WHEREAS, the Town Board wishes to set a public hearing concerning adoption of this Local Law, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT E RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board shall meet and hold a public hearing at the Queensbury Activities Center, 742 Bay Road, Queensbury at 7:00 p.m. on April 2°d, 2001 to hear all interested persons and take any necessary action provided by law concerning proposed Local Law No.: of 2001, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board further authorizes and directs the Queensbury Town Clerk to publish and post a Notice of Public Hearing concerning proposed Local Law No. _ of 2001 in the manner provided by law. Duly adopted this 19a' day of March, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Brewer, Mr. Brower, Mr. Martin, Mr. Turner, Mr. Stec NOES: None ABSENT:None �4, RESOLUTION ADOPTING SEQRA NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ENACTING LOCAL LAW NO.3 OF 2001 TO AMEND QUEENSBURY TOWN CODE CHAPTER 179 "ZONING" TO ADD DAY CARE CENTER AS A PERMITTED USE IN MR-5 ZONE RESOLUTION NO.: 155, 2001 INTRODUCED BY: Mr. Theodore Turner WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION SECONDED BY: Mr. James Martin RECEIVE® TOWN OF OULPNSBURY PL� N'C O'r -OE WHEREAS, the Queensbury Town Board previously received a request from Schermerhom Properties, hic., to consider amendment of Town Code Chapter 179 entitled "Zoning" to include day care centers as a permitted use in any Multifamily Residential Zone (MR- 5), and WHEREAS, the Town Board is presently considering adoption of a new Zoning Ordinance and the draft Zoning Ordinance provides for this addition to the MR-5 zone, and WHEREAS, thejown Board wishes to consider adoption of Local Law No.: 3 of 2001 to amend Queensbury Town Code Chapter 179 entitled "Zoning," specifically Section 179-18 entitled "Multifamily Residential Zones, MR-5", to add day care centers as a permitted use in any MR-5 zone, and WHEREAS, this legislation is authorized in accordance with New York State Municipal Home Rule Law § 10 and Town Law Article 16, and WHEREAS, the Town Board duly held a public hearing on April 2"a, 2001 and heard all interested persons, and WHEREAS, a copy of the proposed Local Law has been presented at this meeting and is in form approved by Town Counsel, and WHEREAS, as SEQRA Lead Agency, the Town Board has reviewed a Short Environmental Assessment Form to analyze potential environmental impacts of the proposed Local Law, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board hereby determines that the proposed Local Law No.: 3 of 2001 presented at this meeting will not have any significant environmental impact and a SEQRA Negative Declaration is made, and BE TT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Queensbury Town Board of hereby enacts Local Law No.: 3 of 2001 to amend Queensbury Town Code Chapter 179 entitled "Zoning," as presented at this meeting, and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby authorizes and directs the Queensbury Town Clerk to file the Local Law with the New York State Secretary of State in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Law and acknowledges that the Local Law will take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State. Duly adopted this 2nd day of April, 2001, by the following vote: AYES . Mr. Turner, Mr. Brewer, Mr. Brower, Mr. Martin NOES . None ABSENT: Mr. Stec Town of Queensbury Plaunm,&d • 5129/01 RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN NO.13-2001 FOR SCHERINIERHORN PROPERTIES, CONTRACT VENDEE DAY CARE CENTER RESOLUTION NO. SP 13-2001 INTRODUCED BY: Chris Hunsinger WHO MOVED ITS ADOPTION: SECONDED BY: Richard Sanford WHEREAS, the Town Planning Board is in receipt of Site Plan No. 13-2001, Schermerhorn Properties for constriction of a 9,600 sq. ft. Day Care Facility with associated site work Day Care Centers in MR-5 zones require Planning Board review and approval. Cross Reference: SB 9-2000. Tax Map No. 60-24, 3.92 acres, Lot #5 Baybrook Professional Park and; WHEREAS, the application was received 4/25/01; and WHEREAS, the above is supported with the following documentation and inclusive of all newly received information, not included in this listing as of 5/11/01: 5/29/01 Staff Notes 5/21/01 C.T. Male Associates engineering comments 5/14101 Tom Nace revised information May 14, 2001 5115101 Staff Notes 5/10/01 K. Chadwick for J. Lapper, Real Estate Contract 5/9/01 Warren Co. Planning: Approved 5/8/01 Notice of Public Hearing 5/7/01 L. Moore from M. Shaw 5/7/01 Beautification Comm. comments 5/2J01 Meeting Notice 4/30/01 R VanDusen, M Shaw from L. Moore — transmittal of application materials 4/27/01 C.T. Male Associates engineering comments 4/3/01 R Schermerhom from C. Brown 4/2101 Town Bd. resolution 155,2001 3/19/01 Town Bd. resolution 141,2001 3/5/01 J. Lapper from C. Round WHEREAS, public hearing was held on 5/15/01 and 5/29/01 concerning the above project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has determined that the proposal complies with the Site Plan requirements of the Code of the Town Queensbury (Zoning); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the environmental factors found in the Code of the Town of Queensbury (Zoning); and Town of Queensbury Plannisoard • 5/29101 WHEREAS, the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been considered and the Planning Board has adopted a SEQRA Negative Declaration; and/or if application is a modification, the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Review Act have been considered; and the proposed modification(s) do not result in any new or significantly different environmental impacts, and, therefore, no further SEQRA review is necessary; and WHEREAS, approval of the application means that the applicant can now apply for a Building Permit unless the lands are Adirondack Park Jurisdictional or other approvals are necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that The application is approved based on the resolution prepared by Staff with the following conditions: 1. The final plans include the following. a. all trees should be three inch caliper b. there be an insert map of the subdivision included on the site plan C. the zoning of the project area be provided on the site plan and the setbacks for the project be provided 2. In addition, it's conditioned on the connection to the proposed municipal waste system when it's provided, and 3. A pedestrian connection to other developments in the park, and 4. Installation of a landscaping sprinkler system, and 5. The subdivision shall be recorded prior to a CO being issued on this project Duly adopted this 29th day of May, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: Mr. Sanford, Mr. Vollaro, Mr. Ringer, Mr. Metivier, Mr. Strough, Mr. Hunsinger, lvfr. MacEwan NOES: None Cc: R Schermerhom 79 Masters Common North Queensbury, NY 12804 Nace Engineering 169 Haviland Road Queensbury, NY 12804 Warren Co. Planning 1340 State Route 9 Lake George, NY 12845