Silver Circle Phase IB Draft ReportPhase IB Cultural Resources Survey
Silver Cirrcle Additional Storage Development
Town of Queensbury, Wafrren County New York
prepared for
27 Silver Circle LLC
Attn: Joseph P. Gross
27 Silver Circle
Queensbury, NY 12804
prepared by
David Moyer and Douglas Idleman
Birchwood Archaeological Services, Inc.
131 Marion Avenue
Gilbertsville, NY 13776
www.birchwoodarchaeology.com
November 2022
Management Summary
Phase IB Cultural Resources Survey, Silver Cirrcle Additional Storage Development
Town of Queensbury, Wafrren County New York
SHPO Project Review Number:
Involved State and Federal Agencies: DEC
Phase of Survey: IA/IB
Location Information
Location: Dead end of Silver Circle Drive
Civil Division: Town of Queensbury
County: Warren
Survey Area (Metric & English)
Length: 600 ft approx (182.8 m)
Width: 300 ft approx (91.4 m)
Depth: >5 ft (1.5 m)
Number of Acres Surveyed: 4.0
Number of Square Meters & Feet Excavated:
Percentage of the Site Excavated:
USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Map: Glens Falls
Archaeological Survey Overview
Number & Interval of Shovel Tests: 62 STPs (40 cm round) in 15 m (49.2 ft) intervals
Number & Size of Units:
Width of Plowed Strips:
Surface Survey Transect Interval:
Results of Archaeological Survey
Number & name of prehistoric sites identified: 0
Number & name of historic sites identified: 0
Number & name of sites recommended for Phase II/Avoidance: 0
Results of Architectural Survey
Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries within project area: 0
Number of buildings/structures/cemeteries adjacent to project area: 2
Number of previously determined NR listed or eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 0
Number of identified eligible buildings/structures/cemeteries/districts: 0
Report Author(s): David Moyer and Douglas Idleman
Date of Report: November 2022
ii
Table of Contents
Executive Summary...............................................…………………………………….…....…..............……... ii
List of Tables .....................................................................…………………………………...……………...... v
List of Figures ........................................................................…………………………………..……....…....... v
List of Photographs .....................................................................………………………………...……………. v
Introduction ...........................................................................………………….…………………....………..... 1
Environmental Setting and Soils...................……...........……………………………….…………….. 2
Precontact Sensitivity and Known Prehistoric Sites…………………………………………………... 3
Historic Sensitivity and Known Historic Sites and Structures………………………………………...
3
Field Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………..
3
Results ....................................................................…………………………...……………….………………. 4
Surface Inspection ..............................................………………………………………….…................ 4
Subsurface Investigations .............................................……………………………............………….. 4
Summary and Recommendations ...................……………………………………..................…...................... 6
References Cited ............................................................…………………………………………….......…….. 7
. Appendix A. Figures ................................………………………………………………….…………….……. A-1
Appendix B. Photos ..........................................................………………………………….………............…. B-1
Appendix C. Shovel Test Pit Records…………………………………………………………………………. C-1
iii
List of Tables
List of Figures
Figure 1. Detail of USGS Glens Falls 7.5 minute topographic map with the past and current project
area indicated………………………………………………………………………………………….. A-1
Figure 2. Map showing the location of subsurface testing within the project boundaries. ……………………. A-2
Figure 3. Detail of NRCS soil map with project area indicated. …………………..…………………………… A-3
List of Photographs
Photo 1. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing southwest……………….. B-1
Photo 2. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing west……………………... B-1
Photo 3. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing northwest……………….. B-2
Photo 4. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing northeast………………… B-2
Photo 5. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing east……………………… B-3
Photo 6. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing southeast………………... B-3
Photo 7. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing west……….. B-4
Photo 8. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing northwest…. B-4
Photo 9. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing northeast…... B-5
Photo 10. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing east……….. B-5
Photo 11. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing southeast…. B-6
Photo 12. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing southwest… B-6
Photo 13. View of stormwater pond to the northeast of the project boundaries, facing northeast……………... B-7
Photo 14. View of commercial construction to the east of the project boundaries, facing east………………... B-7
Photo 15. View of commercial construction to the east of the project boundaries, facing southeast…………. B-8
Photo 16. View of commercial construction to the east of the project boundaries, facing southwest………… B-8
Photo 17. View of mechanized soil testing in the eastern part of the project area, facing northwest…………. B-9
Photo 18. View from the southeast corner of the project area, facing northeast………………………………. B-9
Photo 19. View of modern homes to the south of the project boundaries, facing south………………………. B-10
Photo 20. View of buildings from the southeast corner of the project area, facing southwest………………... B-10
Photo 21. View of logging road in the southern part of the project area, facing northeast……………………. B-11
Photo 22. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing northeast……………... B-11
Photo 23. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing southeast…………….. B-12
Photo 24. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing south…………………. B-12
Photo 25. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing southwest……………. B-13
Photo 26. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing northwest…………….. B-23
Table 1. Typical profile of Oakville loamy fine sand. ……………………………………………………........... 3
iv
List of Photographs
(continued)
Photo 27. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing north…………………. B-24
1
Introduction
Birchwood Archaeological Services was contracted to conduct Phase IB cultural
resources survey for the proposed Silver Circle Additional Storage Area Development
Project located in the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York. A Phase IA/IB
cultural resources survey was previously conducted for the northern part of this parcel in
July of 2016 (Moyer and Idleman 2016). The current study has been requested to assess
the potential that significant cultural resources may be located within the current project
area. The investigation was performed in compliance with Section 14.09 of the New
York State Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation Act.
The project is located in a light industrial area at the west end of Silver Circle Drive in
the Town of Queensbury, Warren County, New York (Figure 1 and 2; Photos 1-27). The
current project involves the creation of a new storage area for the existing commercial
electrical contractor facility located adjacent to the current study area. The Area of
Potential Effect (APE) for this project encompasses approximately 4.0 ± acres directly to
the south of the previously tested area. Depth of the proposed ground disturbance will not
exceed five feet (1.5 m).
This Phase IB study utilizes the results of the prior Phase IA/IB study to assess areas of
high and low sensitivity for archaeological remains as well as to provide contexts with
which to interpret any findings. Field investigations were conducted by the principal
investigator to identify any intact archaeological deposits which may be impacted by the
proposed construction
2
Environmental Setting and Soils
The project area is located along a sandy lake plain south of Lake George and east of
French Mountain. Topography within the project boundaries is relatively level, with
elevation ranging from 384 feet (117 m) above mean sea level in the northwest near the
cul-de-sac to approximately 389 feet (119 m) in the northeast. The project is situated at
the north end of a large oxbow in the Hudson River, which is dominant water source in
the vicinity, occurring 1,261 feet (385 m) to the south. Other nearby water sources
include Clendon Brook, located 0.9 miles (1.546 km) to the west, and Halfway Creek,
located 1.5 miles (2.4 km) to the north. While the project area is relatively level and near
the valley bottom the soils seemed well drained and no wetland areas were noted in the
vicinity, possibly due to the manipulation of drainages during the historic period.
The NRCS web soil survey (WSS) shows one soil type as occurring within the
boundaries of the project: Oakville loamy fine sand (Figure 3; map unit OaA). The
Oakville series consist of very deep, excessively drained soils formed in sandy eolian
deposits on dunes and beach ridges on outwash plains, lake plains, and moraines. Slope
ranges from 0 to 60 percent. A typical soil profile of Oakville loamy fine sand is listed
below in Table 1.
Table 1. Typical profile of Oakville loamy fine sand.
Horizon Depth Description
A 0-3in.
(0-8 cm)
very dark brown (10YR 2/2) fine sand, grayish brown (10YR 5/2) dry;
weak fine granular structure; very friable; very strongly acid; clear wavy
boundary
BE 3-6 in.
(8-15 cm)
dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/4) fine sand; weak fine and medium
subangular blocky structure; very friable; many fine and very fine, and
common medium and coarse roots throughout; very strongly acid; clear
wavy boundary
Bw1 6-15 in.
(15-38 cm)
strong brown (7.5YR 5/6) fine sand; weak medium subangular blocky
structure; very friable; common very fine to coarse roots throughout;
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary
Bw2 15-27 in.
(38-69 cm)
strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) fine sand; weak medium and coarse
subangular blocky structure; very friable; many medium and coarse roots
throughout; very strongly acid; clear wavy boundary
Bw3 27-42 in.
(69-107 cm)
brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) fine sand; weak medium and coarse
subangular blocky structure; very friable; common fine and very fine,
and many medium and coarse roots throughout; strongly acid; clear
irregular boundary.
BC 42-59 in.
(107-150 cm)
light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) fine sand; weak medium and coarse
subangular blocky structure; very friable; common fine and very fine,
and many medium and coarse roots throughout; strongly acid; clear wavy
boundary
C 59-80 in.
(150-203 cm)
light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) fine sand; single grain;
loose; common fine and very fine, and many medium and
coarse roots throughout; strongly acid.
The above soil profile suggests that both historic and prehistoric resources may
potentially be found in the upper 38-69 cm (15-27 in) of soil overlaying parent material.
Subsurface testing should be conducted to a minimum depth of 20 cm (8 in.) into the
Bw2 horizon whenever possible.
3
Precontact Sensitivity and Known Prehistoric Sites
The prior Phase IA/IB study (Idleman and Moyer and Idleman 2016) includes a
Prehistoric Overview which provides information about the chronological development
of Native cultures in Central New York State. The study also included a check of site
files of the Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation and the New York State
Museum as listed on the NY Cultural Resources Information System (NY-CRIS). Results
of this review indicated that there are eleven previously recorded precontact
archaeological sites are known within one mile of the APE, including sites dating from
the Late Archaic through Middle Woodland Periods. The project area is in close
proximity to several large and small wetlands, which would have supported waterfowl
and other game of interest to prehistoric hunter gatherers. For these reasons the area is
considered highly sensitive for prehistoric remains. Areas of the project that have been
substantially disturbed are considered poorly sensitive.
Historic Sensitivity and Known Historic Sites and Structures
Result of the prior Phase IA study indicate that the project area is highly sensitive for
historic remains. One historic site has been reported within one mile of the project: the
former location of a boom crane used in the 19th and early 20th century as part of the
region’s historic timber industry. While no NRHP listed or eligible properties occur
within one mile, the region is rich in history dating from its significance as an important
transportation corridor during the 18th century through a period of more intensive
development in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Individuals interested in learning more
about this historic site or the historical development of the area are referred to the prior
Phase IA/IB study (Moyer and Idleman 2016).
Field Methodology
Field investigations were conducted to identify any historic or prehistoric cultural
resources that may be impacted by the proposed project. The Phase IB fieldwork was
conducted on October 4th and 5th of 2022 and was supervised by David Moyer, RPA.
Staff archaeologist Royce Duda assisted in the subsurface investigations. Photographs
were taken of the project area, adjacent visible structures, and areas of disturbance
(Appendix B).
Standard shovel test pits (STPs) were used to test for buried cultural deposits. STPs are
small (about 40 cm or 16-inch diameter) holes excavated with a shovel; sediments are
screened through 1/4-inch mesh to look for artifacts. STPs are excavated in natural soil
layers, as much as possible, and are dug through the topsoil to at least 20 cm (~ 8 inches)
into culturally sterile subsoil. STPs were placed at 15 m (49.2 ft) intervals across the
areas of proposed ground disturbance unless otherwise noted (see Subsurface
Examinations). When an STP was placed in an area that was obviously disturbed (e.g., in
a ditch along the side the road) or in standing water, an attempt was made to move the
shovel test beyond the area of disturbance, to a maximum distance of 3 meters from its
original location. Wetlands and areas of substantial previous disturbance were not tested.
A list of the STPs and their soil profiles is provided in Appendix C. Excavation of STPs
was halted 20 cm (8 in.) into culturally sterile subsoil unless noted in the STP records.
4
Results
Surface Inspection
The area of potential effects (APE) was first subjected to a pedestrian walkover of all
areas of proposed ground disturbance. The APE for the current project measures
approximately 4.0 ± acres and involves tree clearing, ground leveling and paving in an
industrial area in the Town of Queensbury. The current project APE is situated directly to
the south of the prior Phase IA/IB study conducted for this project (Moyer and Idleman
2016) and represents an expansion of this existing facility. The project was accessed via a
large existing paved storage area situated to the east of the project area (Figure 2; Photos
1-6). Much of the area outside of the current project boundaries appears disturbed by
heavy machinery. A stormwater pond occurs adjacent to the northeast corner of the
project area (Photo 13).
The area directly south and east of the current project area consists of an open field. A
large warehouse or industrial building was actively under construction at the time of our
investigations (Photos 14-16 and 18). Some evidence of mechanized soil testing was
noted along the eastern edge of the trees (Photo 17). The rears of several modern homes
were visible to the south of the project area, although this view was largely obscured by
trees (Photos 19 and 20).
Vegetation within the proposed storage expansion area consisted of mature trees which
obscured the view of surrounding parcels (Photos 7-12 and 22-27). Surface visibility
within the project area was poor due to leaf cover. Occasional logging road and ATV
trails were noted near the project boundaries (Photo 21).
No historic or precontact artifacts or features were noted and no archaeological sites were
identified as part of the surface inspection.
Subsurface Examinations
Subsurface testing was conducted throughout the entire 4.0 ± acres of proposed
development. A total of 62 STPs were excavated at 15 m (49.2 ft) intervals in all areas of
proposed improvements (Figure 2). Each STP was labeled according to transect, with
numerical labels used to designate the individual holes. Of the 62 STPs excavated, none
recovered any historic or precontact artifacts. No cultural features were encountered as
part of the subsurface testing and no archaeological sites were identified.
STPs excavated within the project boundaries ranged in depth from 40-61 cm (15.7-24.0
in) below the ground surface, with an average depth of 50.4 cm (19.8 in). STPs
performed as part of this project reached a sufficient depth as to extend below potentially
cultural material bearing soils. The soils encountered as part of the subsurface
investigations appeared stratigraphically intact and were similar to the soil profile for
Oakville loamy fine sand (Table 1). Topsoil generally consisted of 10YR 3/3 dark brown
loamy sand overlaying a subsoil consisting of 10YR 4/6 dark yellowish brown loamy
5
sand. STP E-12 encountered a deeper BC horizon soil consisting of 10YR 6/2 grayish
yellow brown coarse sand beneath the normal subsoil.
Little evidence of soil disturbance was noted. The excavation of two of the STPs (B-4
and C-7; 3.2%) were stopped by impenetrable root networks at depths of 40 and 44 cm
(15.7 and 17.3 in) below the ground surface, respectively. No soil anomalies or buried
soil horizons were noted.
6
Summary and Recommendations
A Phase IB Cultural Resources Survey has been completed for the proposed Silver Circle
Additional Storage Area Development Project located in the Town of Queensbury,
Warren County, New York (Figure 1 and 2; Photos 1-27). The project involves the
creation of a new storage area for the existing commercial electrical contractor facility
located adjacent to the current study area The Area of Potential Effect (APE) for this
project encompasses approximately 4.0 ± acres directly to the south of the previously
tested area. Depth of the proposed ground disturbance will not exceed five feet (1.5 m).
The Phase IB survey includes a surface inspection and subsurface testing in order to
identify historic and precontact artifacts and features. A total of 62 STPs were excavated
at 15 m (49.2 ft) intervals in all areas of proposed improvements. Of the 62 STPs
excavated, none recovered any historic or precontact artifacts. No cultural features were
encountered as part of the subsurface testing and no archaeological sites were identified.
Based upon the results of the study, the proposed project will have No Effect on any
historic or precontact cultural resources in the vicinity and should be allowed to proceed.
If any artifacts or archaeological deposits are encountered during construction, all work
should cease, and a qualified archaeologist should be retained to evaluate these finds
prior to construction resuming. These recommendations are subject to the review and
concurrence of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic
Preservation.
7
References Cited
Moyer, David and Douglas Idleman
2016 Phase IA/IB Cultural Resources Survey, Silver Circle Lot 5 Development Project, Town of
Queensbury, Warren County, NY. Report on file at NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic
Preservation, Waterford, NY.
Silverman, Mark H.
2004 Soil Survey of Saratoga County, New York. USDA Soil Conservation Services, U.S. Government
Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Appendix A.
Figures
Figure 1. Detail of USGS Glens Falls 7.5 minute topographic map with the past and current project area indicated.
Previous Phase I APE
400 800 1200 m
4000 ft20000
0A-1Current Phase I APE
Area Surveyed in
2016
A1
B1
C1
D1
E1
F1
A8 B9 C10 D11
E12
F12
Additional Storage Area
27 Silver Circle
62 Test Pits<<<<2722
23242526<<
<<<<1>23 45<6
<<<<12
>78 910<11
13 <1415
16
<<<17<181920
<<<21 <A-2Figure 2. Map showing the location of subsurface testing within the project boundaries.
Key
Negative Shovel Test Pit
Photo Angle5<
Area of Potential Effect (APE)
60 80 120 m
400 ft2000
0A-3Figure 3. USDA Web Soil Survey Map with the project area indicated.
Previous Phase I APE
Current Phase I APE
AppendixB.
Photographs
B-1
Photo 1. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing southwest.
Photo 2. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing west.
B-2
Photo 3. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing northwest.
Photo 4. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing northeast.
B-3
Photo 5. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing east.
Photo 6. Portion of panoramic view from the north end of the project area, facing southeast.
B-4
Photo 7. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing west.
Photo 8. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing northwest.
B-5
Photo 9. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing northeast.
Photo 10. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing east.
B-6
Photo 11. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing southeast.
Photo 12. Portion of panoramic view from woods in the northern part of the project area, facing southwest.
B-7
Photo 13. View of stormwater pond to the northeast of the project boundaries, facing northeast.
Photo 14. View of commercial construction to the east of the project boundaries, facing east.
B-8
Photo 15. View of commercial construction to the east of the project boundaries, facing southeast.
Photo 16. View of commercial construction to the east of the project boundaries, facing southwest.
B-9
Photo 17. View of mechanized soil testing in the eastern part of the project area, facing northwest.
Photo 18. View from the southeast corner of the project area, facing northeast.
B-10
Photo 19. View of modern homes to the south of the project boundaries, facing south.
Photo 20. View of buildings from the southeast corner of the project area, facing southwest.
B-11
Photo 21. View of logging road in the southern part of the project area, facing northeast.
Photo 22. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing northeast.
B-12
Photo 23. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing southeast.
Photo 24. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing south.
B-13
Photo 25. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing southwest.
Photo 26. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing northwest.
B-14
Photo 27. Portion of panoramic view from the central part of the project area, facing north.
AppendixC.
ShovelTestPitRecords
C-1
Appendix C.
STP Records
STP Lvl from
(cm)
to
(cm)
Soil Description Soil
Interpretation
Artifacts
(Y/N)
Comments
A-1 1 0 18 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-1 2 18 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
A-2 1 0 20 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-2 2 20 47 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
A-3 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-3 2 23 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
A-4 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-4 2 22 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
A-5 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-5 2 24 52 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
A-6 1 0 27 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-6 2 27 51 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
A-7 1 0 27 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-7 2 27 54 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
A-8 1 0 18 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
A-8 2 18 48 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-1 1 0 19 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-1 2 19 47 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-2 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-2 2 22 51 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-3 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-3 2 24 52 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-4 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-4 2 24 40 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N stopped by roots
B-5 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-5 2 23 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-6 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-6 2 22 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-7 1 0 20 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-2
STP Lvl from
(cm)
to
(cm)
Soil Description Soil
Interpretation
Artifacts
(Y/N)
Comments
B-7 2 20 49 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-8 1 0 25 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-8 2 25 55 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
B-9 1 0 27 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
B-9 2 27 55 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-1 1 0 27 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-1 2 27 55 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-2 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-2 2 24 49 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-3 1 0 20 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N in logging road
C-3 2 20 48 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-4 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-4 2 23 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-5 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-5 2 24 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-6 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-6 2 24 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-7 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-7 2 22 44 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N stopped by roots
C-8 1 0 27 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-8 2 27 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-9 1 0 26 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-9 2 26 51 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-10 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-10 2 24 52 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-1 1 0 21 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-1 2 21 48 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-2 1 0 19 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-2 2 19 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-3 1 0 18 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-3 2 18 49 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-4 1 0 21 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-4 2 21 51 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
C-3
STP Lvl from
(cm)
to
(cm)
Soil Description Soil
Interpretation
Artifacts
(Y/N)
Comments
D-5 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-5 2 23 51 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-6 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-6 2 22 49 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-7 1 0 17 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-7 2 17 48 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-8 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-8 2 22 49 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-9 1 0 25 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-9 2 25 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-10 1 0 27 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-10 2 27 55 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
D-11 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
D-11 2 23 41 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-1 1 0 21 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-1 2 21 49 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-2 1 0 26 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-2 2 26 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-3 1 0 25 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-3 2 25 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-4 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-4 2 23 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-5 1 0 26 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-5 2 26 52 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-6 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-6 2 24 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-7 1 0 17 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-7 2 17 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-8 1 0 24 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-8 2 24 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-9 1 0 25 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-9 2 25 52 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-10 1 0 26 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
C-4
STP Lvl from
(cm)
to
(cm)
Soil Description Soil
Interpretation
Artifacts
(Y/N)
Comments
E-10 2 26 55 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-11 1 0 31 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-11 2 31 61 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-12 1 0 14 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
E-12 2 14 31 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
E-12 3 31 60 10YR 6/2 grayish yellow brown coarse sand BC Horizon N
F-1 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-1 2 23 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-2 1 0 25 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-2 2 25 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-3 1 0 19 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-3 2 19 51 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-4 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-4 2 22 49 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-5 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-5 2 23 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-6 1 0 25 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-6 2 25 53 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-7 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-7 2 22 51 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-8 1 0 22 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-8 2 22 50 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-9 1 0 26 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-9 2 26 55 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-10 1 0 23 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-10 2 23 54 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-11 1 0 21 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-11 2 21 44 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N
F-12 1 0 14 10YR 3/3 dark brown loamy sand A Horizon N
F-12 2 14 44 10YR 4/6 brown loamy sand B Horizon N