Additional Information November 2014
ZBA
Old Business:
AV 64-2014 William G. Gedney
33 Sullivan Road
Additional information recd on Oct. 15, 2014
For November 2014 review.
•
Zoning Board of Appeals - Record of Resolution
Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 (518) 761-8238
FOLLOW - UP RESOLUTION
TO: William G. Gedney PROJECT FOR: William G. Gedney
33 Sullivan Road 33 Sullivan Road
Queensbury, NY 12804 Area Variance No. 64-2014
ZBA Meeting Date: Thursday, September 11, 2014
Your application, after review and consideration by the Zoning Board of Appeals, was:
_X_ Tabled.
A copy of the resolution is attached.
Additional requirements and review for this project shall include:
Zoning Office
_X_ Please provide additional information as requested by the following date and time:
Wednesday, October 15,2014 by 4:30 pm
_X_ Your application will be placed on a November, 2014 ZBA agenda pending submission of
revised application materials.
Sincer ly,
Craig Brown
Zoning Administrator
CB/sh
Encl.
Cc: George W. Gedney
Approval of the application means that the applicant can now apply for a Building Permit unless
your lands are Adirondack Park Jurisdictional or other approvals are necessary (such as review
by the Queensbury Planning Board.)
Zoning Board of Appeals - Record of Resolution
Town of Queensbury 742 Bay Road Queensbury, NY 12804 (518) 761-8238
Steven Jackoski, Chairman Roy Urrico, Secretary
TO: William G. Gedney PROJECT FOR: William G. Gedney
33 Sullivan Road 33 Sullivan Road
Queensbury, NY 12804 Area Variance No. 64-2014
ZBA Meeting Date: Thursday, September 11, 2014
The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Queensbury has received an application from William G.
Gedney for a variance from Section(s): 179-4-030; 179-5-020 of the Zoning Code of The Town of
Queensbury. Applicant proposes construction of a 1,080 sq.ft. detached garage at a height of 25 ft. 6 in.
Parcels are in the process of being combined. Relief requested from minimum front and rear yard
setback requirements. Also, relief requested from maximum height restrictions for an accessory structure
in the WR zoning district.
SEQR Type II-no further review required;
A public hearing was advertised and held on Thursday, September 11, 2014 and left open;
Upon review of the application materials, information supplied during the public hearing, and upon
consideration of the criteria specified in Section 179-14-080(A) of the Queensbury Town Code and
Chapter 267 of NYS Town Law and after discussion and deliberation,we find as follows:
MOTION TO TABLE AREA VARIANCE NO. 64-2014 WILLIAM G. GEDNEY, Introduced by Michael McCabe
who moved for its adoption, seconded by John Henkel:
Until the November meeting, Paperwork to be submitted by the middle of October.
Duly adopted this 11th day of September, 2014, by the following vote:
AYES: Mr. Freer, Mr. Kuhl, Mr. Garrand, Mr. Urrico, Mr. McCabe, Mr. Henkel, Mr. Jackoski
NOES: NONE
Steven Jackoski, Chairman
Queensbury Zoning Board of Appeals
SJ/sh
cc: George W. Gedney
Approval of the application means that the applicant can now apply for a Building Permit unless
your lands are Adirondack Park Jurisdictional or other approvals are necessary (such as review
by the Queensbury Planning Board.)
A-)G-cJ Alit"e_dv..
(of c( z`f
William G. Gedney
33 Sullivan Road
Lake George, NY 12845
October 15, 2014
Information regarding Area Variance Application
I am respectfully submitting additional information in response to the motion to table Area Variance No.
64-2014 submitted at the public hearing held September 11, 2014.
The determination of the meeting was to deny, and then table, my application due to the board not
granting a height variance of 9.5 Ft. for the proposed structure. The amount allowed for this structure is
16 Ft.
I am respectively asking the Board to consider a modification in the roof design and allow the height to
be not more than 22 Ft. at the highest point of the roof, a variance of 6 Ft. Please refer to the attached
Gable End Elevation Option "A".
We believe that this structure will be consistent with other structures in the neighborhood, is
aesthetically pleasing,will allow for the intended uses, as discussed in the initial meeting, and also allow
us to design a structure to existing codes without incurring unrealistic construction costs.
The proposed change to the roof design and overall height are the only derivations from the original
application as we were to understand the Board had no issues with the building footprint, placement
and setbacks requested.
Sin y,
George W Gedney, on b•• alf of William G. Gedney,Owner.